<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cisco router gets hacked &#8211; attacker adds tunnel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cinci2600.com/345/cisco-router-gets-hacked-attacker-adds-tunnel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cinci2600.com/345/cisco-router-gets-hacked-attacker-adds-tunnel/</link>
	<description>Technology and Security in Today's Fast-Paced Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:46:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vom</title>
		<link>http://cinci2600.com/345/cisco-router-gets-hacked-attacker-adds-tunnel/comment-page-1/#comment-1433</link>
		<dc:creator>vom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 00:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinci2600.com/?p=345#comment-1433</guid>
		<description>xio2: the real reason you would configure a tunnel from a router back to $something, is to forward IP packets through it, and have your own &#039;exit node&#039; on the net.  Think of it as a much faster, private-just-for-you Tor exit node.  So (I may not be understanding your question correctly), ssh/telnet was simply used to get into the router.  The tunnel is ROUTING full IP.  So it&#039;s even more than Tor (UDP,etc).  You basically are sitting &#039;behind&#039; that router as if you were at that companies site / data center.  It&#039;s like open wifi but accessible from anywhere on the net, not just from the driveway :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>xio2: the real reason you would configure a tunnel from a router back to $something, is to forward IP packets through it, and have your own &#8216;exit node&#8217; on the net.  Think of it as a much faster, private-just-for-you Tor exit node.  So (I may not be understanding your question correctly), ssh/telnet was simply used to get into the router.  The tunnel is ROUTING full IP.  So it&#8217;s even more than Tor (UDP,etc).  You basically are sitting &#8216;behind&#8217; that router as if you were at that companies site / data center.  It&#8217;s like open wifi but accessible from anywhere on the net, not just from the driveway <img src='http://cinci2600.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://cinci2600.com/345/cisco-router-gets-hacked-attacker-adds-tunnel/comment-page-1/#comment-1394</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 20:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinci2600.com/?p=345#comment-1394</guid>
		<description>i finally got around to reading the article, and it&#039;s pretty cool.

the comment about cliff stoll&#039;s assessment on people who look over their shoulders is an interesting one.

what the article doesn&#039;t mention is how much time was spent checking redundant change management systems before contacting the incident response team?

here&#039;s a sobering thought: how many companies don&#039;t have change management systems, incident response teams, or log alert systems like rancid?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i finally got around to reading the article, and it&#8217;s pretty cool.</p>
<p>the comment about cliff stoll&#8217;s assessment on people who look over their shoulders is an interesting one.</p>
<p>what the article doesn&#8217;t mention is how much time was spent checking redundant change management systems before contacting the incident response team?</p>
<p>here&#8217;s a sobering thought: how many companies don&#8217;t have change management systems, incident response teams, or log alert systems like rancid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xio2</title>
		<link>http://cinci2600.com/345/cisco-router-gets-hacked-attacker-adds-tunnel/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>xio2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinci2600.com/?p=345#comment-306</guid>
		<description>Remote management FTL. Wouldn&#039;t SSHing through to a server and back out to the router work just as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remote management FTL. Wouldn&#8217;t SSHing through to a server and back out to the router work just as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
